Structured data and AI search
Short answer
Google says no special schema.org markup is needed to appear in AI Overviews or AI Mode. Structured data remains useful for rich results, where Google recommends JSON-LD, requires the markup to describe content visible on the page, and does not guarantee display. Whether markup changes AI citations is unestablished.
For AI features
Section titled “For AI features”Formats
Section titled “Formats”Guidelines that apply to all markup
Section titled “Guidelines that apply to all markup”FAQ rich results are gone
Section titled “FAQ rich results are gone”Microsoft: feeds, markup and the page must agree
Section titled “Microsoft: feeds, markup and the page must agree”Microsoft’s guide for retailers on Copilot shopping describes three kinds of data: crawled web data, product feeds, and what AI agents read on the live site. Structured data is not a fourth source. The guide asks for prices and stock to match across the product feed, on-site schema and what shoppers see.
This is a marketing guide from Microsoft’s ad business, not ranking documentation. It describes Copilot’s shopping features, not AI answers in general. Its advice agrees with Google’s guidelines above: markup must describe what is visibly on the page.
What is not established
Section titled “What is not established”- That adding structured data increases citations in AI answers on Google or other platforms. See the open research design in Does structured data change AI search citations?.
How this wiki uses it
Section titled “How this wiki uses it”Each entry outputs Article (or CollectionPage for hubs) and BreadcrumbList JSON-LD describing what is visibly on the page. It includes no rich-result types the page does not actually contain. See Article structured data for why Article rather than a subtype.